Posts Tagged ‘Civil Religion’

Sotomayor and the WOMEN of Iran

Tuesday, June 23rd, 2009

Judge Sonia Sotomayor, a wise Latina woman, made the headlines for several days – if not a few weeks – as she was slandered and labeled a dubious character because of a comment she made a while back about a wise Latina woman making better decisions than a white male. Regardless of what anyone thinks of the comment one should look beneath the surface to reach the source of the comment:
Power.

The fact is that women, regardless of their age, race, or class, have been subjected to various forms of the sin of sexism. Women, for the sheer fact that they are women, have been and are abused, stereotyped, taken advantage of, etc., and as we see in the brave and courageous faces of the women of Iran, silenced and subjected to abuse, violence, all because of an age old myth that the God of heaven and earth has ordained that female be less than and subject to male. (Incidentally, this myth has made its mark in many religious traditions). This sinful lie has made its home in our hearts causing all of us to give in and to live in ways that are not reflective of the kingdom which Jesus spoke of.

So, when Sotomayor made this comment she was – may I conjecture – speaking of her experience as a Latina woman who has had to struggle harder to find power in this world than most white males. As a result, her experience as a Latina woman would be different than that of a white male who would have power by the sheer fact that he is a white male. The experience and insight of a person who has had to struggle more for power always has something unique and powerful to offer those of us who have not had to struggle as much to gain power. Therefore, some might be appalled and perplexed by the statement, but we must realize that what we say and what we do always has context; experience will always inform how we think (even those who are interpreting and making and enforcing law).

All that being said, we see the tragic and at the same time inspiring events unfold in Iran as we see the faces of women who are legally 2nd class citizens in that country courageously stand up to the sinful forces that have so cruelly and violently enforced the myth. We see the face of men and women who want to have power for and with one another and not over and against each other. Now more than ever the voices, the stories and the EXPERIENCES of these women are finding their way into our homes and soon, if not already, we will begin – only begin – to realize how some of us are simply given more power than others for the sheer fact that we are male, or that we are American, or this or that, and there is no reason to be defensive, but instead to humble ourselves, especially as people of faith, and ask how we might live in ways that our more reflective and proactive in  destroying the various myths we’ve internalized about women, about Muslims and so on, and cherish one another seeking to have power WITH and FOR each other and not OVER and AGAINST one another.

Finally, in these challenging times President Obama is being urged to take more action as the oppression, suppression, and violence against the Iranian people increases. May we be hard pressed to think and pray for this situation because, as Martin Luther King Jr. has reminded us, “Violence begets violence.” What fruit would an attack on Iran produce? Would it help the survivors of the oppressed in this country?

May God grant the men and women of Iran God’s peace, comfort and continued courage.  Amen.

Is Obama an Exponent of Civil Religion?

Tuesday, February 10th, 2009

Reviewing Obama’s text for his Inaugural Address got me thinking about what it is exactly that Obama, or any President for that matter, means when they invoke God and God’s relationship to “Our Nation”.   Certainly the differences abound concerning Obama’s personal faith, and say that of George W. Bush;  I think that is well-established and documented.

Yet it is curious to think of the fact that both Bush and Obama, with differences in meaning, allude to God and how God interacts with our nation.  (Just take a look at Bush’s Inaugural Address in 2000, the similarities with Obama’s speech are striking concerning God and Nation).

So what do we make of this:  Is Obama speaking of some civil religion that invokes God and God’s providence as an essential part to the history of the U.S.?  Of course, this need not necessarily be “Christian” religion.  It could be anything ranging from the Deism of Jefferson to the evangelicalism of Chuck Colson.  Or, it could be nothing connected to any particular religious tradition and strictly be a “civil” religion in the sense that America has a special or “sacred,” if you prefer that terminology, status in history.

The fact that Obama speaks of a “new era” and “remaking America again,” all the while invoking “God,” seems to embrace the idea that America has a special history tied to a special identity.  Whether that history and identity needs to remade is another issue, but I think it is fairly evident that Obama is appealing, as many Presidents have before, to this tradition. (NOTE: This does not mean that America is a Christian Nation, only that God is often referenced in conjunction with the identity of the U.S.)

Does that mean that Obama is an exponent of civil religion?  I do not know.  I think Obama personally would not identify himself with civil religion.

It could also certainly be the case that Obama’s rhetoric is not meant to invoke civil religion per se, but is a way of speaking to a nation made up of people from myriad faiths.  In a pluralistic society, that would simply be an appropriate way of speaking to diverse people without alienating them.

At the same time, it is still up for debate whether Obama’s appeal to reclaiming the essence of American identity is an indication that America has a civil religion and Obama is an exponent of it.

Indeed, it might be more important to discuss whether America has a civil religion in the first place rather than whether it is the case or not that Obama is an exponent of it.

I will leave that up for you to decide.

It certainly is an interesting matter to consider.

Obama At National Prayer Breakfast

Thursday, February 5th, 2009

I was wondering if folks had responses to Obama’s remarks at the National Prayer Breakfast?  Below are the remarks as prepared in full.  I think the real meat of the remarks is when he speaks of faiths working together.  Although that sounds good – and is something the president needs to stay – it is not where a lot of Christians in this country are.  I’ll never forget talking to a friend about world hunger problems and his response being “does it really matter if their bellies are full if they are going to hell.”  Our faith is one that calls us to work with other faiths in love.  In tangible love – in realia – not just in various forms of salvific love.  While my friend was just asking a question, many many Christians in this nation don’t think hunger and poverty matter if people are “going to hell.”  That is a trouble that the best politicians cannot correct.  It is a theological problem.  A disease running in our own flock.  The President’s remarks today reminded me of how much work we, here at M25 and our allies, have to do.

Full Remarks Under The Fold -
(more…)

10 minutes with … Robert Bellah

Tuesday, February 3rd, 2009

Daniel Burke, from Religion News Service, has an interesting reflection with Robert Bellah concerning President Obama

Though he has written numerous books and articles, Robert Bellahknows he will

always best be known as the author of “Civil Religion in America.”

The seminal 1967 essay, which popularized Jean-Jacques Rousseau’s notion of shared cultural ideas, illuminated the subtext beneath cherished American myths and ideals. Chief among these, Bellah argues, is that human rights are God-given, and America’s leaders are obliged to carry out God’s will.

Bellah talked about Abraham Lincoln, President Obama’s inaugural address, and why former President George W. Bush didn’t get (civil) religion. Some answers have been edited for length and clarity.

Q: Some call Abraham Lincoln the Jesus of American civil religion—he freed the slaves, saved the country, and was killed on Good Friday,. Is that going too far?

Keep Reading